Why teach history of Math?
Hi everyone
“[H]istorically inspired
exercises may stimulate the student’s interest and contribute to curricular
enhancement alongside those exercises and problem which may seem more
artificially designed.” (p.204-205) I agree with this idea; however, this
activity will take a lot of time and the curriculum in BC does not allow thus
activity happen. The teacher is not be prepared to teach the history of math.
Learning
math history is not only benefit for student but also benefit for teacher.
Knowing the math history helps the learners have deeper understanding about the
knowledge. I still do not understand the sentence “history may enter either
explicitly or implicitly” (p.209),
“[T]he
teacher has the opportunity to compare modem mathematics with its form in the
past (notation, terminology, methods of proof and of computation, etc). Presentation
of aspects of this comparison may be beneficial for the students” (p.211). This
idea is good but it is not practical because the teacher needs to use all the
notation in the book, if not the students will be confused about what is the
right notation which they will use when they do their homework.
After reading this article, I understand
that learning history of math helps students develop “personal growth and
skills” (p.205). Normally, I just think that history of math only helps student
understand about the original of the structure or the formular.
Jessica, I am intrigued by your discussion of how emotions connect with learning mathematics. And, I agree that 0 is an amazing number when you contemplate its history.
Trả lờiXóaIf a teacher says something directly to the students, or it is written in a book, this is explicit learning. However, if content and methods are used without explaining where they came from, then the associated cultural values and assumptions will still be there, just never discussed. They will be taught implicitly. I hope that this helps! Please ask me again if you like.